‘Every Night’: MSNBC Seems to Have Found a New OBSESSION in Elon Musk #Political
MSNBC’s The 11th Hour
02/04/2025
11:25 PM
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: DEMOCRATS PUSH BACK ON ELON MUSK & DOGE EFFORTS]
STEPHANIE RUHLE: All right, Max, let's talk about Elon Musk. Early days, the idea was, he was going to be kind of hiding in the background pulling strings. But he is even more than front and center. I mean, this guy is getting more headlines than Donald Trump. What is your latest reporting?
MAX CHAFKIN: Yeah, he is not a behind the scenes kind of guy. I mentioned over the weekend he got access to these- or we believe he got access anyway- to these Treasury Department payment systems. This is very strange, you know, it is not a normal thing. It's probably illegal- and just a- huge- expansion of his authority.
And then there was this account of Elon Musk and his- you know, DOGE- these DOGE- young men- young men and- and perhaps a few women, I'm not sure, but- but the DOGE kids who basically broke into the USAID office as part of what Elon Musk described as- as taking a wood chipper to the agency. And this is like a federal agency that is, you know, really important, does all this important work all over the world. And just speaking about it in- just really callous terms of- of destruction.
And- and so- so he has been front and center and potentially, as- those clips show, you know, potentially doing stuff that could prove to be unpopular, I think.
RUHLE: Trump allies- excuse me, Elon Musk and Trump allies argue, “well, we need this. We need somebody to come in. We need like a restructuring guy, to come in, look at these budgets, you know, slash them, clean them up. The United States government has been bloated and lazy for years and years.” But what- why should we believe Elon Musk, right? While he's an extraordinarily successful business guy, he himself is an agent of chaos.
TIM O’BRIEN: Well, and he's not a universal genius, none of us are. He made a hash out of Twitter. You know, Max knows this very well. He didn't understand the media industry. He didn't understand social platforms. And he went in there and essentially blew up a platform that had very valuable relationships and served a very overt need. He-
RUHLE: He would argue it's more successful than ever. He would argue.
[ELON MUSK’S AGGRESSIVE PUSH INTO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT]
O’BRIEN: Well, he- it would be successful if what he wanted to do was- was poison the well at Twitter, drive some other- people off the platform, and use it to service his own political- needs.
RUHLE: Yes, yes and yes.
O’BRIEN: Yeah. So in that regard, sure, that's successful, for him. And if he can blow billions of dollars down the drain in the service of that, fine. But in terms of the finances of it, or in terms of the management of it, it's not objectively successful.
And he's now coming into the federal government. He has no experience. One can belittle the idea that you need any experience to run the federal government, but it's not true. We all rely on the federal government when we have a need. People turn to FEMA when there's a natural disaster. All the people that say they hate the federal government, or they don't want the government to intrude in their lives, turn to the government to defend them in foreign wars and to protect them during natural disasters at home.
And if these guys were very serious about cutting back government spending, they'd have to look at Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security-
RUHLE: And Social Security-
O’BRIEN: -and defense spending. That would- and they're not going to touch any of that, which means their impact on federal spending is going to be next to nil.
If they want to come in and make the agencies themselves function more efficiently, and get a- a bead on what the right level of employment is, and the right way to run those agencies more effectively, you don't come in there and kneecap veterans, who actually have skill sets and expertise and understanding about how to deliver services.
This is performative, and it's- it’s a stage act, and Trump and Musk both like to see themselves as change agents, rather than simply agents of chaos.
RUHLE: Let's talk USAID for a moment, because our friend Peter Baker wrote the following: “Today, total USAID annual spending to provide food, medicine, shelter, and other services to impoverished countries around the world: $38 billion. Total increase in Elon Musk's personal net worth since the November election: $156 billion.”
All of that made me remember, back when Elon Musk- this had to be two years ago- when he said he was willing to spend $6 billion to end world hunger. What happened there?
CHAFKIN: I mean, Tim hinted at this. Twitter was a success as an influence play, and I think there is a way to see what Elon Musk is doing with the government, as an influence play-
RUHLE: But remember when he said, “I will spend $6 billion-
CHAFKIN: I do-
RUHLE: -and I will end world hunger?”
CHAFKIN: I mean, he has- he's on to the next thing. He's- he's on to being this kind of-
RUHLE: That check was never cut?
CHAFKIN: It was- no, it wasn't cut. He's- he has given very little money to philanthropy and his- I think in Elon Musk's mind, you know, sending Elon Musk to Mars is a form of philanthropy is- maybe the greatest form of philanthropy. It also happens to be a way that, you know, guarantees him if- he were able to convince Trump and NASA and the American public that this was a good idea, it would be worth tens of billions of dollars.
RUHLE: And it's been his dream to go to Mars for years and years.
O’BRIEN: Let's let him go.
RUHLE: Yes-
O’BRIEN: He can go.
RUHLE: Except he wouldn't be doing it on his own dime. He would now have the US government behind him. And I'm unfamiliar with any group of voters that said going to Mars was a top priority for them.
O’BRIEN: Also, Tesla has- you know- was a creation, in part, of federal subsidies. It was also innovation, great private enterprise, but it was a nice example of a public-private partnership that ended up being successful. And he's now allied with a president, who wants to gut the EV industry and has no patience for it from a business standpoint. Again, it makes no sense for him to be in that relationship, but I think he's now focused on being performative and not being productive.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: ELON MUSK EXERTS POWER, TARGETS AID]
RUHLE: Performing works at times.
O’BRIEN: Yeah, it does.
RUHLE: We're going to have to keep covering it every night.
(...)
from Newsbusters - Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing Follow News Busters
Red Pill Pharma A psychological pharmaceutical that unlocks logic and reason offering a second chance at individualism.
Sourced by the Find us on telegram. Real News for Patriots of the United States of America. We share content that re-affirms our soulful connection to light, Truth, and the Constitutional God given rights of Freedom and Liberty.
No comments