Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Breaking News

'Due Process': Brzezinski Combatively Questions Details of Platner Rape Allegation #Political

https://bit.ly/4bxwU5A


After the new sexual assault allegations against Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner, Morning Joe’s Mika Brzezinski showed some skepticism about the allegations and continuously asked for “evidence” in a pretty combative interview with Politico reporter Adam Wren, whose outlet published the claims. Brzezinski also showed concern over Platner’s “due process” as he faced the allegations.

Platner had appeared on Morning Joe many times during his campaign, including a love-fest interview in May where Joe Scarborough constantly smiled at Platner. During an interview from June, Scarborough asked Platner about his “so-called scandals.”

Instead of direct questions on the details of the story, Brzezinski focused her questioning of Wren with skepticism over details in the story.

In her opening question, she asked, “There's not a police report, correct? Correct me if I'm wrong. There's not a legal case playing out here for due process to see itself through. So, my question to you, given the very high standards Politico has before they write something like this and publish it, what aspects of this story brought it to the level of publishable?”

Wren admitted there was no police report but noted evidence of message exchanges between the accuser and her therapist about Platner and said: “We found ultimately the number of corroborating pieces of evidence to support her story in a way that we could report it.”

Brzezinski pushed Wren further and focused on “consent,” and asked if there were “Any conversations with Graham Platner at the time of it where she said, because apparently, as part of this story, she says she even confirmed to him that this was not consent. Do you have that? What do you have that actually connects this literally, Graham Platner, to raping this victim?”

Wren said there were DMs, as Brzezinski injected and asked if they were “able to see those DMs,” as Wren explained she tried to recover them but couldn’t. She continued: “Did you actually physically see them? Did she produce them for you?”

To note, the Politico report alleged Platner entered accuser Jenny Racicot’s home, “uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. “

At the close of the interview with Wren, Brzezinski continued her skeptical questioning and asked what made Politico decide to publish the story:

What is the actual - is there evidence between her and him, evidence of a crime? Because he's being accused of rape. So, what put this over the edge?

(...)

What's the through line? What ties this together and gives you the evidence to bring this story to the point of publishable?

Wren continued his defense and said, in part, “Politico stands by our reporting (...).”

In a later interview with Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Brzezinski also showed concern over “an accusation made in the media, not in the court of law” and Platner’s “due process”:

And are you at all concerned about the timing of this accusation in terms of just fairness in politics and due process?

Brzezinski had a history of defending Democratic politicians with combative remarks amid liberal media reports during controversies, as she defended then-President Biden after his disastrous debate in 2024 in a Biden call-in interview on Morning Joe in the aftermath.

Clearly, in situations of Democratic controversies, she plays full defense, even with such horrible claims as those against Platner.

With Joe Scarborough’s absence from Tuesday’s show, viewers will have to wait to see his reaction to the news, especially after he compared himself to Platner just under two months ago.

The transcript is below. Click "expand":

MS NOW’s Morning Joe

July 7, 2026

6:09:19 AM Eastern

(...)

MIKA BRZEZINSKI:  Adam, I want to get right to the questions about this. The questions surrounding this on both sides of this debate. There's not a police report, correct? Correct me if I'm wrong. And there's not a legal case playing out here for due process to see itself through. So my question to you, given the very high standards Politico has before they write something like this and publish it, what aspects of this story brought it to the level of publishable?

ADAM WREN: Yeah, you're correct here, Mika. There is no police report in this case. We spent a lot of time talking to Jenny, you know, asking her for corroborating evidence. She shared that she had confided into a number of people, including her therapist, and almost real time. And we reviewed email exchanges between she and her therapist, referring to what she called the sexual assault and her therapist sort of acknowledging that this is this had happened to her. 

We talked to people who she confided in in the months after this happened. We asked her why she didn't file a police report. And she described sort of the insular nature of where she lives and her corner of Maine that she shares with Graham Platner. And she, you know, debated sort of how to handle this. And we found ultimately the number of corroborating pieces of evidence to support her story in a way that we could report it.

BRZEZINSKI: So, what are some of those corroborating pieces of evidence? So you've got conversations with her therapist and people who she confided in. Any conversations with Graham Platner at the time of it where she said, because apparently, as part of this story, she says she even confirmed to him that this was not consent. Do you have that? What do you have that actually connects this literally, Graham Platner, to raping this victim?

WREN: Yeah. She reached out to him the day after via Instagram and essentially, you know, told him that, you know, she didn't want to hear from again. She told him that morning as well. And, you know, we looked at messages that she had sent to others in the months after this happened through social media-

BRZEZINSKI: But you were able to see those DMs? 

WREN: She tried to recover those DMs. We did not - we were not able to review those DMs, but she described them to us. We also, long before he was a public - before he was a political candidate, we saw her essentially explain to others that he was, quote, in her words, “consensually careless,” end quote. And - 

BRZEZINSKI: Right, but do you - were you able to see the interactions between Graham Platner and this alleged victim? Did you actually physically see them? Did she produce them for you?

WREN: She attempted to uncover them. She - but was unable to.

BRZEZINSKI: Willie?

WILLIE GEIST: So, let's talk a little bit, Adam, about some of the timing of this. Some people have pointed out it's a week out from the date the Democrats now have to scramble and potentially find a new candidate. If Platner does indeed drop out, as he's expected to. We'll talk more about his support in the Democratic Party nationally at the state level has collapsed after these revelations. She was, Jenny, in that New York Times piece. She appeared in the piece a few weeks ago. So what's your sense of why she decided she wanted to go into more detail with you at this point?

WREN: Yeah, Willie, she was frustrated with how that article landed. She told us she was frustrated with another woman that she knows who was quoted in that piece, how she how her story was received. She felt there was a lot of negative polarization around that, that anecdote that she was written off just because she was a Republican. And, you know, she wanted Maine voters to have sort of the full story here. And, you know, she sort of relayed all of this to us.

(...)

6:16:43 AM Eastern

BRZEZINSKI: So, Adam, in closing, obviously this is a huge political bombshell story, a story that might, probably will lead to the end of Graham Platner’s campaign. And I'm just - I'm going back to the decision to publish, and I'm curious what concrete evidence. You have conversations with therapists, conversations with friends. But what took this story beyond Graham Platner saying this was consensual, Jenny Racicot saying this was not consensual? 

What took it over the edge and had you and your editors decide to publish, of course, kind of an earthquake in Democratic politics? What was the piece of evidence or pieces of evidence that made you sure of this story?

WREN: Yeah. I mean, long before he was a political candidate, long before much of the country knew his name, Jenny, in her telling, had confided in a number of people. We saw screenshots that she shared of messages relaying this account to others. We viewed an email response from her therapist to her acknowledging that they had talked about –

BRZEZINSKI: Those are the things I said, but those aren't - What is the actual - is there evidence between her and him, evidence of a crime? Because he's being accused of rape. So, what put this over the edge.

WREN: Yeah, I mean -

BRZEZINSKI: Because he says he didn't and he has people on his side who say he didn't. She says he did. And there are people, but none - There's - I'm trying - What's the through line? What ties this together and gives you the evidence to bring this story to the point of publishable?

WREN: Yeah. You know, we interviewed her, you know, three separate times. Her story stayed consistent across those times. You know, we talked to people who she had spoken with contemporaneously about these attacks, and all of those stories lined up and checked out. And ultimately, you know, Politico stands by our reporting and we talked to, you know, people who corroborated her story, largely.

(...)

6:20:39 AM Eastern

BRZEZINSKI: Willie, this is -  Obviously, Graham Platner has been really dogged with different stories along the way, and there are a lot of analysts who are now saying, “Why did it take so long?” At the same time, this is an incredible moment in time to come forward, and some are questioning that as well.

The tim-ing.

(...)

7:13:21 AM Eastern

BRZEZINSKI:. But I would like to ask you to weigh in on this latest news that broke in the past 24 hours, senator, and that's the accusation of rape made against Senate candidate Graham Platner. 

To be clear, an accusation made in the media, not in the court of law. What is your take on what should happen? Should he step down due to this accusation?

SEN. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-NH): Well, good morning. And yes, I think he should step down. It's time, and the sooner the better.

BRZEZINSKI: Have you been moved by this latest accusation, or all along, have you been concerned about this candidate?

SEN. SHAHEEN: There are a number of issues that have surfaced with respect to Mr. Platner, and I think taken together, it means that the Democrats need to look for another candidate.

BRZEZINSKI: And are you at all concerned about the timing of this accusation in terms of just fairness in politics and due process? And do you feel that an accusation should take down a candidate, or is there a bigger picture that you're talking about here, Senator?

SEN. SHAHEEN: Well, again, I think if you take the issues broadly, it's more than just this one accusation, although certainly it sounds very serious. So, again, I think for the good of the seat, for the good of the Democratic Party, Mr. Platner should get out of the race.

(...)
 

Adblock test (Why?)



from Newsbusters - Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing Follow News Busters




Red Pill Pharma A psychological pharmaceutical that unlocks logic and reason offering a second chance at individualism.

 




Sourced by the Find us on telegram. Real News for Patriots of the United States of America. We share content that re-affirms our soulful connection to light, Truth, and the Constitutional God given rights of Freedom and Liberty.

via Newsbusters - Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing - News Busters

No comments